PDA

View Full Version : Return of the Superhero - A Look at the PG Era



Travicity
10-08-2010, 01:22 AM
Return of the Superhero.


Wrote By: Adam Hopson (Exclusive Columnist).

When the WWE decided to take it's product in a new direction in 1997, from the PG 'family orientated' show to a more risque and violent presentation, Vince McMahon told us, the audience, this;

'We at the WWE think that you are tired of having your intelligence insulted... The era of good guys versus bad guys, and the era of the superhero good guy is definitely passe'.


The Attitude Era blurred the lines between what had been known as 'good guys and bad guys'. Prior to this, the babyfaces were men like Hulk Hogan and Bret Hart. Guys who took great pride in being suitable role models for kids, guys who rarely cheated, and guys who would always triumph against the odds.

Then came Stone Cold Steve Austin. Austin changed the dynamic. Often referred to as an 'anti-hero' - the Stone Cold character was supposed to be a bad guy, but the bloodthirsty audience cheered him, and with WCW forcing the WWE to make a wild change of direction with its own revolutionary programming, this was the perfect solution. The babyface characters from this point forward all had a bad guy element to them, and the fans simply began to cheer for whoever they wanted to cheers for - not who the WWE presented to them as babyface characters.

Fast forward to present day, and we find WWE has changed direction again, a full U-Turn from the Attitude Era and back into a PG format. It shouldn't be a surprise to find that a man playing that old 'superhero' character is getting a mixed reaction in the current climate.
The older demographic, that were watching when Vince told us all that this character is 'passe' and the fans that cheered loudly for Steve Austin has he flipped the bird and drank beer in the ring are having understandable trouble accepting John Cena. However, the new fans, the kids, are lapping up every minute, just like the kids in the 80s that watched Hulkamania run wild.

The issue with today's 'smart' fans (SMARKS), is that they think that they know how the WWE product should be presented.

While the kids are enjoying seeing their hero John Cena defy all the odds every week, some of the older fans are feeling more and more ripped off every single time he has his hand raised in victory. The problem is, while these more 'experienced' fans are complaining about Cena, all they are really doing is playing into WWE's hands. As long as people are talking about Cena - Vince McMahon and his team, including John Cena, are laughing all the way to the bank.

While the 'SMARKS' use excuses for their hatred toward Cena, like he 'can not wrestle' or that he is 'terrible on the mic' - the facts are that Cena uses as many (if not more) moves as Hogan, Austin, even Triple H. Their have been better storytellers than Cena (Hart, Guerrero, Michaels) but John is on par in that department with, say, Hogan or The Ultimate Warrior. Any fan who knows anything about WWE knows that the most technically sound 'wrestler' is not always the most entertaining, and certainly isn't the guy who wins the most championships, or sells the most T-shirts. Cena is not a terrible performer, at all - he is simply the top guy in a company that is making another huge directional change, a change that many of the most loyal WWE fans do not like. The only responsibility these fans have is to decide if they are still enjoying the show or not - not to tell WWE how to do business.

So, it looks like it's the 'smart' wrestling fans that are playing the fools here, not WWE.
And while a large contingent of these viewers have been begging for a Cena heel turn because they think it's the right thing for business - the truth is that Cena IS good for business. Everyone is talking about him, and his merchandise sales are phenomenal.
Remember, Cena was already on top of WWE when they made the decision to go back to PG. Prior to this, he had been cheered wildly by much of the audience, he rarely got a mixed reaction in those days, you watch his WrestleMania 20 and 21 matches, or his Draft to Raw as WWE Champion - the proof is in the pudding.

Yes, it is the same old routine, he has now taken the role of the pure 'good guy' and will gladly salute a man who refuses to shake his hand (where Steve Austin would have delivered a stunner at such a show of disrespect). But Cena is doing EXACTLY what is required of him, which is why he remains on top. Its only natural that the people focus their frustration of a major change in the direction of one person.

With that being said, John Cena has recently being forced to join his nemesis faction, The Nexus. But how the WWE play this angle out remains to be seen at this point. Cena is currently a member of the evil group, reluctantly, due to the stipulation in the match that he lost to Nexus leader with Wade Barrett. Time will tell if Cena does make a complete heel turn, or if he keeps his 'good guy' persona and attempts to destroy Nexus from the inside.

Vince McMahon wanted a superstar to carry the WWE into this new PG era as the 'face' of the company. A man who would be able to withstand the gigantic workload and possible rejection from a large portion of the existing audience.
Cena, knowing the risks involved in taking up such a challenge, approached Vince and proclaimed 'I'm your man'. And he is.

WNS

jaydawg30
10-08-2010, 04:15 PM
all very good points. i've never understood the "hatred" for cena. im 32 yrs old and have lived through all of the "phases" of pro wrestling. i think cena is entertaining and a HELLUVA lot better "wrestler than hogan or warrior. "(and i loved and still love both of them). the kids like having guys they can root for. what is wrong with that. didnt the "old school" fans have guys they pulled for as kids before they became "smart"?

Metalitia
10-08-2010, 04:52 PM
all very good points. i've never understood the "hatred" for cena. im 32 yrs old and have lived through all of the "phases" of pro wrestling. i think cena is entertaining and a HELLUVA lot better "wrestler than hogan or warrior. "(and i loved and still love both of them). the kids like having guys they can root for. what is wrong with that. didnt the "old school" fans have guys they pulled for as kids before they became "smart"?

Whilst I can't talk for anyone else, for me personally the problem with Cena and his constant pushes is that whilst it's true he's arguably on a par with Hogan and Warrior, when those two were around they were more or less revolutionary and if you wanted to watch wrestling then the WWF as it were was your main source.

That was 20-30 years ago though and needless to say a LOT has happened in that time. The majority of us who have been watching wrestling a long time know that there is so much more that can be done with the current WWE product in particular. What frustrates me is that, save for a 3/4 year period WWF/WWE has always been the pinnacle company in the wrestling world. It is the company that every other organisation in the business aspired to be on the same level as.

It isn't just the PG era that is to blame for some disillusionment, for me it goes further back. Albeit more slowly, WWF started to decline in it's constant quality a year or two after buying out WCW and in doing so eliminating their competition. They started resting on their laurels somewhat.

In no way am I saying I haven't enjoyed WWE since that time, Jericho vs HBK from Wrestlemania XIX is one of my favourite matches, but the signs started to appear at times then.

I recall still being at school when the draft split first started and there was such ill feeling towards Smackdown compared to Raw. Despite the likes of Angle, Benoit, Eddie and Lesnar on there. Raw is WWF/Es main staple TV show. It always has been and for all intents and purposes, it still is.

To answer your question, as a kid of course I and I'm sure many others liked more who we were told to like rather than who we choose to of free will as we were children and there isn't much development to free will when you're not even five. I remember being in awe of Ricky Steamboat every time he'd shoot the flames and just the sheer size of The Undertaker made him seem phenomenal.

The other favourite of mine at the time was of course The British Bulldog.

I'm interested to see who everyone else on here loved when they were kids if they watched it then? See how many are the same like.

Kenpachi Zaraki
10-08-2010, 08:12 PM
I'm interested to see who everyone else on here loved when they were kids if they watched it then? See how many are the same like.

That should be a new thread imo...

Back to this article I've always said that PG is not an issue as long as you have decent storylines. McMahon is not a fool he's not a billionaire just like that. Had he been listening to the IWC and smarks he would have been running some lame-ass money losing Indy company. The fact his company is making money despite not having a great program shows how he's managed to have a loyal audience, something very few cos at this level have.

Now my problem with Cena personally is his Superman character. While the writer says that Cena has people watching truth is I rarely watch his matches and watch just the odd promo, some of which are just horrible (Aquaman WTF).

So end of the day, McMahon knows more than you so don't tell him how to do his job fools :P

selvmord
10-08-2010, 09:57 PM
Maybe I'm just weird but as a kid I never liked the good guys. My favorites in WWF during the 80's were Rick Rude & Mr. Perfect. I fucking hated Hogan and the Warrior. And once Jake Roberts turned heel and brought out the cobra that was it for me. I wasn't much into the Road Warriors but I liked the Powers of Pain and Demolition. I hated the Rockers but then became an HBK mark when he superkicked Jannety through the glass. I always wanted to see DiBiase as WWF champion but that never happened. I liked Taker until he went face. I think the only face I really liked was Pillman in NWA/WCW cuz you didn't anyone fly around much back then. Other than that the good guys sucked. heh

Travicity
10-08-2010, 10:01 PM
Lol ive always picked Perfect and Rude over Hogan and Warrior. The smaller guys ive always liked :P

Metalitia
10-10-2010, 07:18 PM
What was it about them that made you prefer them?