PDA

View Full Version : More details on why the WWE pulled Four Way Match from No Way Out



Dangerous Incorporated
02-12-2007, 11:33 PM
More details on why the WWE pulled Four Way Match from No Way Out

PWInsider is reporting that one of the reasons why WWE made a decison over the weekend to pull the scheduled Four Way Ladder Match for the WWE Tag Team Titles at the No Way Out PPV this Sunday (a rematch from the Armageddon PPV in December) was because Vince McMahon no longer wants The Hardys and MNM teaming right now.

McMahon wants to keep Jeff Hardy, Johnny Nitro, Matt Hardy and Joey Mercury in singles roles on their respective brands right now and putting them together as a tag team off and on isn't something they would like to continue. Well, we say this now as they could change their mind at any moment seeing how quickly this one was made over the weekend.

It should also be noted that another reason for making the decision was that the feeling internally was that having a Four Way Ladder Match for the tag titles was meaningless, so they decided to put the new Deuce & Domino tag team in the spotlight to challenge Paul London & Brian Kendrick for the titles this Sunday at No Way Out instead. Again, WWE may still put The Hardys and MNM back together in the coming weeks or months, but as of now that is the plan they are going with.

I dont like either matches. The tag team division sucks and so does D & D. WWE need to have 1 tag team division. I mean look at RAW, the WWE Champ and #1 Contender have the tag titles. Give it to Cryme Tyme or WGTT and push someonewho needs it.

AFC1986
02-13-2007, 12:23 AM
what i don't understand is if vince doesn't want mnm or the hardys to teaming up, why were they going to be in a title match?

Popheat
02-13-2007, 01:15 AM
Personally I think they only need one Tag Title between the two brands, and then they can have inter-brand tag fights since both divisions are so watered down between the two brands. I've never been a fan of mis-fit teams, i.e. two singles forming into a tag team.

It should be:

London/Kendrick
Cryme Tyme
WGTT (meh...)
Highlanders
Hardy's (team up when needed)
MNM (team up when needed)
Big Ears and Noddy (D&D)
and err....errr....anyone else?

That lot can fight inter-brand...I think that would be good for the fans...IMHO

LionDen
02-13-2007, 02:45 AM
Mentioning Tag champions Cena and HBK, they hardly carry the title belts aorund. The old days the Champs carried all belts if they won it. Cena never carries his tag belt and HBK hardly ever does.

Popheat
02-13-2007, 04:24 AM
Shows how much they care for it.....

XXKSXX
02-13-2007, 04:38 AM
Deuce and Domino don't suck there pretty good as a team and I think the tag title match will be pretty good.

yankeesman77
02-13-2007, 04:43 AM
Mentioning Tag champions Cena and HBK, they hardly carry the title belts aorund. The old days the Champs carried all belts if they won it. Cena never carries his tag belt and HBK hardly ever does.

Thne Tag Title Belts will most likely and obviously be used as a divider point to Michaels and Cena to set up their WM match.

Popheat
02-13-2007, 04:46 AM
I'll admit that D&D are ok in the ring...but they're just too new on the scene to deserve to win...look how long it took London/Kendrick to get it off MnM....it's not even been a month...what have they been in...two squashes and two with London/Kendrick? Regal and Taylor beat them twice too didn't they?

All's I'm saying is that there are other's more deserving at this point....

XXKSXX
02-13-2007, 04:53 AM
^ More deserving then the team that has beat them twice? hmmmm......

Popheat
02-13-2007, 08:40 PM
^^^^^ Dont think you're catching my point, but it seems [I]most[I] people thinks it's farcical that Lashley walked over to ECW and won the championship in his first ECW match, thus prompting people to say "what is the belt worth?". The same thing is happening here...it would have been better for them to drop to Regal and Taylor as at least Regal had been around awhile.

XXKSXX
02-14-2007, 11:14 AM
^ Theres just one thing Lashley really does suck.