Welcome to Universe of Wrestling Forums! Established in 2006!

We hope you enjoy your visits.

To get the full benefits of UOW, please register. It is quick and easy.

Benefits include:
- You can do a lot more on forums than social media sites. - Member only forums.
- Friendly members and staff.
- You lose this welcome at the top of the screen every page.
- A chatbox where you can chat in real time about wrestling or anything else.

A lot more to come as UOW is changing this year.

Click here to register!

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Lazarus Rising Vance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,356
    Rep Power
    80

    Default Why Austin weren't on Raw, why Taker/Batista was early on in WM

    Jim Ross recently updated his Blog. Here are a few highlights:

    Jim Ross said that Steve Austin was backstage at RAW this past Monday, however he had the choice to be involved on the show if he wanted, but choused not to be.

    Ross commented on the fact that Hogan vs. Austin will most likely never happen in WWE. He noted that it takes “two to tango,” implying that WWE were only partly to blame for Hogan not being part of this year’s WrestleMania.

    On the decision to put Batista vs The Undertaker on fairly early during Sunday’s WrestleMania 23 PPV (something that a lot of people have been talking about since Sunday night), Ross wrote, “Undertaker vs. Batista was just as big, perhaps bigger to some, as the Cena-HBK match at Wrestlemania 23. Today’s prevailing theory is to create some separation from the featured attractions such as the two aforementioned bouts. Some like this concept and some do not. Most of the wrestlers I talk to do. Without a doubt, the two primary main events at Mania 23 were Taker/Batista and HBK/Cena, no matter where they occurred on the card. They could have reversed roles as to when they each occurred on the card and I would still be saying the same thing. Years ago it was different. The card grew, match by match, and every match was considered to be somewhat more important than the previous match. Times have changed, and that’s simply not the way TV shows or live events are structured these days. Some folks are going to like this philosophy and some obviously don’t.“

    You can view the full Blog at Jrsbarbq.com

    source: Wrestlezone.com

    I do hope Austin comes on raw again soon all maybe it will be the last time he is gonna be on wrestling for awhile
    [SIGPIC]http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/3697/orianthibanner.png[/SIGPIC]

    its my life
    imma do what i do
    and if you don't like it
    its cool fuck you

  2. #2
    On the bench!
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    1,611
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Austin is in the past and you should deal with that. WWE is using the past to draw old fans in but really you have to look at the future and that is John Cena and Bobby Lashley.

  3. #3
    Ring Crew
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Cena and Lashley are only the "future" because they are pushed by the wwe not because they are talented unlike what stone cold and the rock are

  4. #4
    Mid-carder
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    318
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stonecold619 View Post
    Cena and Lashley are only the "future" because they are pushed by the wwe not because they are talented unlike what stone cold and the rock are
    Amen.

  5. #5
    The Maverick legolas4792's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,452
    Rep Power
    158

    Default

    kennedy, mvp and punk are also the future im hoping the title scene changes a bit soon

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •